当前位置:
首页
>
出版信息
>
详细信息
快速检索
数据库:
各中心已购纸本教材
各中心已购电子教材
国内高校课程
国外著名大学课程
外文原版教材出版信息
外文影印版教材出版信息
名校购书信息
关键词:
You Decide! Current Debates in Ethics
书目信息
ISBN:
9780321354471(13位)
中图分类号:
B82
杜威分类号:
中文译名:
你来决定!关于道德的当代辩论
作者:
Waller
编者:
语种:
English
出版信息
出版社:
Longman
出版地:
出版年:
2006
版本:
1
版本类型:
原版
丛书题名:
卷期:
文献信息
关键词:
Philosophy
前言:
摘要:
内容简介:
This inexpensive anthology features pairs of articles by contemporary philosophers about timeless and universal issues in ethical theory that still resonate with students today.
目次:
Debate 1: Ethics and Religion: Does Religion Undercut Ethics or Provide Vital Support for Ethics? Religion Undercuts Ethics. Advocate: James Rachels. Source: “God and Human Experience.” Religion Provides Vital Support for Ethics. Advocate: George N. Schlesinger. Source: New Perspectives on Old-Time Religion. Debate 2: Reason, Objectivity, and Ethics: Can Reason Guide Us to Objective Ethical Truths? Debate 3: Is Ethics Based on a Social Contract? Social Contract Theory Offers the Best Grounds for Ethics. Advocate: David Gauthier. Source: “Why Contractarianism?” Social Contract Theory is an Inadequate Account of Ethics. Advocate: Jean Hampton. Source: “Two Faces of Contractarian Thought.” Debate 4: Can Consequentialism Make Room for Friendship? Debate 5: Morality: Universal Principles of Justice or Specific Caring Relationships? Caring Relationships Can Take Precedence. Advocate: Virginia Held. Source: “Caring Relations and Principles of Justice.” Justice and Care Operate Together. Advocate: Claudia Card. Source: “Particular Justice and General Care.” Debate 6: Do Moral Obligations Always Take Precedence? Debate 7: Do Women Have a Distinctive Ethical Perspective? Women Have a Distinctive Ethical Perspective. Advocate: Annette Baier. Source: “What Do Women Want in a Moral Theory?” Gender Does not Distinguish Different Moral Perspectives. Advocate: Marilyn Friedman. Source: “Beyond Caring: The De-Moralization of Gender.” Debate 8: Can Virtue Theory Offer Moral Direction? Debate 9: Does Contemporary Psychological Research Threaten Virtue Theory? Virtue Theory is Undercut by Contemporary Psychological Research. Advocate: Gilbert Harman. Source: “Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error.” Virtue Theory is not Damaged by Contemporary Psychological Research. Advocate: James Montmarquet. Source: “Moral Character and Social Science Research.” Debate 10: Is Moral Psychology Relevant to Moral Philosophy? Debate 11: How Did Moral Behavior Develop? Morality Developed as a Means of Controlling Powerful Group Members. Advocate: Christopher Boehm. Source: “Conflict and the Evolution of Social Control.” Morality Developed to Protect Systems of Cooperative Exchange. Advocate: Dennis Krebs. Source: “As Moral as We Need to Be.” Debate 12: Pragmatism and the Dispute Over Value Objectivity Debate 13: Is Morality Relative to Culture or Objectively and Universally True? Morality is Relative. Advocate: Gilbert Harman. Source: “Is There a Single True Morality?” Morality is Objectively True. Advocate: Carol Rovane. Source: “Earning the Right to Realism or Relativism in Ethics.” Debate 14: Is Cultural Relativism a Helpful Approach to Ethics? Debate 15: Is Morality an Ideological Illusion? Close Examination of Morality Reveals its Ideological Nature. Advocate: Anthony Skillen. Source: “Is Morality a Ruling Illusion?” The Objectivity of Morality Remains an Open Possibility. Advocate: Peter Railton Source: “Morality, Ideology, and Reflection; or, The Duck Sits Yet.” Debate 16: Is Partiality Toward Fellow Citizens Morally Justified? Debate 17: Is Moral Responsibility Morally Justified?
附录:
全文链接:
读者对象:
实体信息
页码:
288
装帧:
Paper
尺寸:
其它形态细节:
其它信息
原价:
USD
26.6700
原版ISBN:
其它ISBN:
图书特色:
书评:
扩展信息
Isbn:
0321354478
issue:
2006JC01
相关附件